Khadafi is a partner of the Legion of Evil Empire 
We microstories in the structure of a great novel whose first read but its end was not yet written. We happened: we got, we see and we win or lose. Whilst awaiting the final curtain, we take comfort that something we learn from and the cycle of life, comforted us and let us develop our role, we do not earring the "storm", the Holocaust, the market crisis, we console ourselves with the power to pronounce and act our lines, at successive stages in the life-game in which we play. The beginning, during the final and after that fantasy usually leads to madness and religions and blockbusters or the renowned best-sellers find us standing, raising flags and managing our turning points. Grotesque narrative detestable reality surrounding us, should know what we are doing to get somewhere. As
on a story by Graham Greene, Libya secret meetings alternating with quiet time, just as we have Green's prose bombings, threats and instances where cross international chains repeated promises of foreign presidents, as always, promising freedom, justice and peace. Within this atmosphere, the dream scenario "for nothing-mixed cities, roads, deserts, bullets, oil wells, multinational, righteous men, as many sinners, explosions, weird looking shadows in cars, dealers, mercenaries, intelligence, skilled in the art, ignorant and very stupid in the world who speaks or is silent selfishly. In this story is loyal, persecuted opponents, rebels, innocent, guilty and impossible to confirm rumors every hour by turning the hospitals, police stations, the houses closed, the cities destroyed, street fairs, and schools which have become rubble . And this is just a vignette of what can be the downfall of a regime that for decades played an important role in Libya and the rest world. The fall of a dictator who bought by force and power of the petrodollars the character of God, Desert Tigre. We in the Land of Greene. Perhaps only the author who comes to life in The Comedians in the Haiti of Papa Doc or Our Man in Havana in Batista's Cuba could do justice to the heavy atmosphere that is felt in Tripoli in what may be the last weeks of the reign of Khadafi.
In the 41 years in power Moammar Mohamed Abd As-Salam Abu Minyar to Khadafi, or simply Muammar Gaddafi, has displayed a political and ideological transformations and degree of eccentricity difficult to match. Luis D'Elia, Argentina's leader and social piquetero said in his radio program, "Gadhafi went from being 'the tiger of the desert' a 'kitty empire'" best explanation to understand the figure of a leader, dictator, liberating , murderer, there can be and perhaps in this metamorphosis Not-so-resident was the explanation of why the civil war in Libya and the future foreign invasion-more-in other Arab lands of the empire.
In 1969, when his fellow soldiers he was appointed the person who would lead the coup against King Idris, Khadafi was only a captain of 27 years, only 27 years old and already commanded a military coup against an Arab royal family. With victory achieved, was at the head of Libya in the moment they were discovered in the country its vast reserves of oil, which gave him room to undertake major reforms in education, health and social rights, then unpublished in the country and the rest of the region. His reforms were enrolled in what was called from 1977, the Jamahiriya, or "state of the masses," his peculiar theory of democracy, in which fees were abolished and traditional institutions-it is simply Leader Revolution ", to" give power to the people. " The people's committees, consisting of faithful at all costs, displaced ministers, governors, mayors. In this way he managed to amalgamate their power to their environment and their fists. Controversial Khadafi
ranked the eight children he had with his two wives in key parts of the economy and armed forces, preparing to succeed one of them, Saif al Islam. Khadafi fan of pan-Arabism of Gamal Abdel Nasser, but also of Che, Mao, the USSR and more recently, Hugo Chavez, Qaddafi endorsed in the '70s and '80s, with funding and training to guerrillas and movements national liberation of many countries Montoneros.
earned Khadafi This created an aura of progressive, considering it was in the anti-imperialist camp, not a few leftist movements looked the other way when all social protest or repress internal political opposition. Perhaps at this point resides one of the most important conflicts of interest when criticizing Khadafi figure openly in the conflict that occurs in the human and material aid given in past decades to the liberation movements of Latin America and Africa, and on the other, being a dictator, a leader who violated human rights inside and outside the country. Khadafi's figure can be summarized as a coup, early revolutionary, entrepreneur, arms dealer and interests, advocate and a partner oppressors rather hidden-system-imperialist depose both during his unquestionable.
His fiery speech, his outbursts, his "originality" made him a colorful, dark, grotesque. Khadafi has been busy making great Populist movements have exploited the media, while he and his family lived in abundance and accumulated wealth and power and the rest of the population, despite its huge advances, returned slowly to ruin, with their children, their demagoguery, with his eccentricities built a unique image. Over the years, great progress of society were reduced to nothing and was spending his image as the murals painted on public buildings in Tripoli.
Accused by U.S. of being behind terrorist attacks in 1985 against the Rome and Vienna airports and an attack on a Berlin nightclub frequented by U.S. soldiers in 1986, Ronald Reagan made bomb his tent, which killed his daughter Jana. In 1988 he accused Libya of being behind the bombing of a Pan Am airliner in flight over Scotland, which left 270 dead. And Khadafi finally accepted his responsibility, giving the officers accused by Britain and compensating the victims in April 1999. and managed to lift the veto on the UN and the United States disbanded years inthat most government ministries formed and transferred its powers to the municipal people's congresses.
In 2003, Gadhafi announced a radical reform of the socialist regime, was born the so-called "popular capitalism", which was merely the contained culmination of the opening of the Libyan economy to internal and external Privador sector that was growing for four years.
And to finish: in December 2003 reached an agreement with U.S. President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair, for decommissioning by Libya of its weapons of mass destruction.
The Libyan diplomatic approach to the Western democracies continued in 2004, on 20 September of that year, Bush lifted the trade embargo that the United States exercised since 1986, three months later the two countries reestablished diplomatic ties, broken for a long 24 years, in turn, on 22 September, the European Union (EU) put an end to the arms embargo imposed 18 years earlier.
Khadafi is a mutant X-Men His profound changes since the revolution of 69 to today has led to a personal social hierarch of a "monarchical republic" whose heir is his eldest son, Sayf al-Islam al-Gaddafi, who has been appointed sole legal successor. Their businesses shared multimedia projects Berlusconi also speak of this conversion Kafkaesque protagonist of the Axis of Evil a friend of the West, receiving honors for Sarkozy or Condoleeza Rice.
We claim that we know little of what which occurs in Libya and suspicious of Western condemnation, media and institutional, in recent days. We can leave it at that. The imperialists are very smart about how to manipulate information. They have many specific interests in the area, have defended all the way to their dictators, but when they realized that they were untenable have dropped and have chosen another strategy: to support democratic processes controlled motor selecting postmodern minorities limited changes and deploy without shame, knowing that the memory is short and slow reflexes puppet democracies, rights ghosts easily modified ..
Khadafi has been for the past ten years a great friend of the EU and the U.S. and its allies in the region dictators. Suffice it to recall the inflammatory statements of support from the Libyan Caligula deposed Ben Ali, whose militia is likely provided weapons and money in the days after Jan. 14. Docile enough to remember also the cooperation with the U.S. Khadafi in the context of the "war on terror." Political cooperation has been accompanied by close economic ties with the EU, including Spain, the sale of oil to Italy, France and the U.S. has been parallel to the entry into Libya's large Western companies (the English company Repsol, British Petroleum, France's Total, Italy's ENI and the Austrian OM), not to mention the juicy contracts for the European and English building in Tripoli. Moreover, France and America have continued to provide weapons to kill from the air now his own people, as France and the United States, following the example of imperial Italy since 1911. In 2008 former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice made it very clear: "Libya and the United States share permanent interests: cooperation in the fight against terrorism, trade, nuclear proliferation, Africa, human rights and democracy." Khadafi
When he visited France in December 2007, Ayman El-Caiman summarized the situation in a paragraph which I reproduce here: "Almost ten years ago, Khadafi longer for the democratic West unwise individual: that he be taken off the U.S. list of terrorist states acknowledged responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing, for normalize relations with the United Kingdom, gave the names of all Irish republicans who had trained in Libya to normalize the United States, gave all the information he had about the Libyans suspected of involvement in jihad with Bin Laden and renounced its "weapons of mass destruction" as well as call on Syria to do likewise, to normalize relations with the European Union, became the guardian of the concentration camps, where inmates are thousands of Africans bound for Europe, to normalize its relations with its sinister neighbor Ben Ali gave opponents refugees in Libya. "
Khadafi is neither revolutionary nor an ally, even tactical, the revolutionaries of the world, perhaps he could be in 60'o 70 ', but the actual murderer puppet is not. In 2008, Fidel and Chávez (with Mercosur) rightly denounced the "shameful directive" European reinforcing the already severe persecution in Europe of humanity stripped of the boats and the walls. All Khadafi crimes perhaps the most serious and the less well known is his complicity in the immigration policy of the EU, particularly Italy, as the executioner of African migrants. Despite reports that talk about actual practices of extermination "or precisely because of them, demonstrating the effectiveness of Khadafi as guardian of Europe, the European Commission in October signed a" cooperation agenda "for the" management of migration flows and "border control", valid until 2013 and accompanied by delivery to Libya of 50 million euros.
Europe's relationship with Khadafi has brushed submission. Berlusconi, Sarkozy, Zapatero and Blair was greeted with Hugs in 2007 and Zapatero himself visited him in Tripoli in 2010. Even King Juan Carlos went to Tripoli in January 2009 to promote English companies. On the other hand, the EU will not hesitate to humiliate and publicly apologize March 27, 2010 through the then English Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos, having banned 188 Libyans into Europe by the conflict between Switzerland and Libya by the arrest of Gadhafi's son in Geneva accused of maltreating their domestic staff. Even more: the EU has not given the slightest protest when Khadafi took retaliatory economic, trade and human or when performed against Switzerland call for holy war against it or when it publicly declared its desire to be wiped off the map.
None of the current resists Khadafi sworn enemies of a file: There has been a long time since the Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, literally kissed the hand of khadafi-in addition to an investor Juventus shareholder of Finmeccanica, one of the Italian arms major companies "and he could install his Bedouin tent in Rome, but from one day to another he dropped like a stone. The same goes for the British who sold lots of arms to Colonel.
In June 2010, Saif Gaddafi told the British newspaper Daily Mirror that the former premier Tony Blair has an excellent relationship with my father. " Blair is considered a trusted advisor to the Libyan Investment Authority. With that British exports to Libya were up about 930 million euros in recent years.
has been forgotten in the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and his English counterpart, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, a few months ago were fans and lobbyists Khadafi and held that it was essential to boost ties with that country, which was reached to sell to the world as "an oasis for foreign investment."
To see how history has changed within months, not have to see how it is defined to Libya in a story published on the website of the Foreign Trade Institute of Spain (ICEX). "Many experts do not hesitate to point out that Libya is currently booming economic expansion and aiming to become the new Dubai of the Mediterranean coast," read the Libya Investment information late last year that remained posted on the Web official body even after the air strikes began.
A sample of the radical change in alliance with Libya is that in November last year 120 companies from 21 countries (including the English firm Indra) participated in the fair's security and defense Libdex 2010, held at the military airport to mitigate, with Tripoli. United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy, China and Russia attended the meeting. Now, the UN has banned all commercial transactions related to defense.
In language very similar to that used its predecessor, José María Aznar, in 2003, when Spain involved in the Iraq war, the current English President says intervention in Libya was "humanitarian."
To avoid such comparisons leave it badly, Zapatero argues that the United Nations (UN) has endorsed the Khadafi intervention to end, something happened in Iraq after the first attacks on Baghdad.
not true that intervention in Libya, Gaddafi is to prevent slaughter of civilians, but the insurgents are a heterogeneous amalgam in which converge monarchist nostalgic for an old king who advocate Islamic Holy War, cousins \u200b\u200bof Al Qaeda and in-laws of Western interests in the region.
In Spain, Gaddafi and Libyan state-owned companies control the Aresbank bank's network of service stations and various real estate Tamoil. Its crown jewel is the La Resinera, located in Malaga, where he planned to build a mega resort.
All of these assets (with the exception of Tamoil) are operated as part of the agreement of EU governments to freeze the properties of Khadafi and prevent the use to finance the war. The Bank of Spain, for example, has taken over Aresbank.
The English government has also intervened Khadafi bank accounts and 25 other members of his family, including his son Muammar Khamis, who was studying a Masters in Business School.
Spain, however, is not the first fate of Libyan money. In Italy, the former colony, Khadafi participates in Unicredit, the aerospace firm Finmeccanica, and ENI, as well as on the soccer team Juventus, in Turin.
Libya's largest investment is the UniCredit. In late 2008, in the middle of global financial crisis, the Libyan Central Bank purchased shares of the largest Italian bank, was in serious trouble. With the help of Libyan sovereign wealth fund Investment Authority (Leia), Libya became the largest shareholder in UniCredit (with 7.582%), currently one of the largest banks in Europe.
Since January 2011, the Libyan government owns 2.01% of the aerospace and defense group Finmeccanica, the Italian state-controlled. Libya has also almost 0.5% of the oil company ENI. Has 22% of the textile company Olcese and 7.5% of Juventus football club. In June 2009, a company controlled by the Arab Foreign Investment Company acquired a 10% stake in Quinta Communications, of which the majority shareholder is Berlusconi.
But even more striking is the change of position of French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who has gone from selling arms to Qaddafi to lead the attacks on Tripoli. In recent years, the Gallic leader has agreed to build a nuclear power plant in Libya, has confirmed the sale of missiles to Khadafi and paid ransoms of hundreds of millions of euros to the system to free up some nurses hostage. Khadafi has been claimed that he financed part of Sarkozy's election campaign.
Sarkozy
swallows the threat of Khadafi to disclose the amounts, accounts and the banks through which financed his political career if the threat becomes reality, could ensure the victory of Jean Marie Le Pen in the French elections .
As in any war of conquest, in Libya not only weapons, but those who fired, sold to the highest bidder. Perhaps because of this, the first to drop bombs on the army and people of Libya outside France, attempting to intimidate or even annihilate Khadafi not to talk.
The popular uprising in Libya may seem odd, but there may be some reasonable explanations for understanding Case, on the one hand, we can say that the Libyan regime has degenerated in recent years, or so-called socialism was only a front for the regime to hold the Libyan people, we can also say that the anti-imperialist rebellion Khadafi has been just that, pure rebellion, or that the U.S. is taking advantage of these protests in North Africa to settle scores with Khadafi. Think are the top three without discarding the latter.
Khadafi regime is out of print for at least 30 years. Urgently needed that Libya has another government. It is clear that the continuity of Libya's Khadafi to the front due to the power which they hold and the game playing with the major world powers, what powers being asked to be at certain times in history, a day the enemy, another ally, another collaborator and sometimes a monster who must be sacrificed. Libya is not Egypt, but in Egypt the majority of the population faced Mubarak, they were mostly in Libya, that does not happen and so many deaths. Also supports the Army Khadafi in Libya and Egypt, the army released her hand to Mubarak at the magnitude of the protest started shortly after the revolt. Funny
the process that led to the bombing of Libya. The White House hesitated long before they give their approval, said he hoped a resolution of Security Council and approval of the Arab League. Clarified that only later, when several senators complained about the delay in action. One wonders why this delay: expected counteroffensive Khadafi for the two disputing parties are weakened to the maximum, thus opening the possibility of installing a government as akin to the U.S. like Saudi Arabia?
The Pentagon chief Robert Gates and Admiral William Gortney declared that Khadafi is not part of the "target list" and that killing is not on the UN mandate, while the British defense secretary, Liam Fox, reiterated that the Libyan dictator was "a legitimate target." At the very least, Zarkozy dreams that Khadafi stop breathing. The president said that U.S. military intervention was due "to an international arrangement" and that his country's participation is limited, but did not clarify their goals. Resolution 1973 authorizes the Security Council to stop "all means" the killing of civilians unleashed by Khadafi, so that its scope is, at least, indefinite. One of those means would be the invasion, as in Iraq? Obama said that the invasion is not contemplated, but everything is limited to the victory of the rebels or not the regime.
The Arab League is upset because in his view, was established no-fly zone to prevent more civilian deaths, not to increase their number with the raids. Do not remember the consequences of the same measures applied to other countries without major political outcomes? The air exclusion zones imposed twenty years ago not ousted Saddam Hussein, but were propped up with economic sanctions and blockade inflicted serious damage on the Iraqi people. "I did not know that the West League resolved the impasse by invading Iraq? Do you worry now because it is not unanimous global support for the odyssey of Dawn and also because he questions his role in sheltering the bombing of a nation Arabic?
The White House does not diminish his optimism: the attacks would last "days, not weeks," an opinion in which Hillary Clinton is the manager of repeating, but that idea did not share much. Huriburt Heather, who heads the National Security Network, a group working for the White House, said the outcome in Libya "will be more like that of Kosovo to Baghdad." Kosovo: months and months, not days, of bombing firestorms and the passage of one year from the end of the massacres ordered by Slobodan Milosevic and his deposition. "The end is near," added Haliburt. The ending was the overthrow of Gadhafi and that, indeed, is not nearby. Washington seeks to get rid of the command of the operation, Obama may not want to appear as the aggressor against another Muslim country, the third in a decade, but NATO can not take over the job officially, Germany abstained in the vote of the Board of Security has withdrawn all its forces from the Mediterranean and decided not to participate in the no-fly zone. Chancellor Angela Merkel suggested, however, a general embargo on Libyan energy, causing a general frown eyebrows European countries imported 85 percent of Libyan oil is supplied by Germany and Russia. Industry giants such as France's Total, the Italian ENI, British BP, the consortium English Repsol and Chevron, among others, the Libyan soil extract.
Libya is the most important oil-producing nation in Africa, followed by Nigeria and Algeria: black gold reserves are close to 3.5 percent of world reserves and more than double the U.S. Military intervention includes, without doubt, much more than concerns about the humanitarian issue: whether the U.S. achieved hegemony in the north African weakening of French influence in particular, and the other former European colonial powers in the entire black continent in general, closer to your strategic goal to dominate most of the resources of the planet. A plan dutifully Imperial.
The decision of the Security Council of the UN has at least three different objectives intimately linked by the same need. The most immediate is to prevent the defeat of the opposition National Council of Khadafi settled in the city of Benghazi. This objective serves to the second, to shield the invasion of Saudi Arabia to Bahrain. Converges to the repression imposed by the emirate, Tunisia and Yemen to dismantle the regional dynamics of the Arab rebellion. The third objective is to control the Libyan state to secure their deposits. A vast reserve of 46 billion barrels of light crude.
-Libyan Oil and its state, without which no oil- should be seen as a necessity of this imperial geopolitics. No empires out of commodities. U.S., Japan, Canada, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, China also focus the need. No accident that the dominant multinational Khadafi in Libya want to continue after him. There is an exact
continuity of civilization was built with those derived from this crude and the open era in this century. Few things move in this world since the early twentieth century can do without oil as a basic input. What has been a breakthrough for mankind ended become "devil's excrement" in the hands of capital. This definition belongs Juan Pablo Perez Alfonzo, the Venezuelan minister that OPEC devised in 1960. When asked in an interview why such a macabre phrase for a resource as "useful", he reminded the reporter that "in the name of 'black gold' increased the statistics of the wars that were previously done by other things." He was right. (Disaster, JP Pérez Alfonzo and Domingo Alberto Rangel, Ediciones Vadeboncoeur, 84, Caracas, 1976.)
would be in the presence of war number 37 for control of oil directly, since 1914. This was the first by specialist authors, because it ended in the secret pact between France and England in 1916 to divide Syria and the Middle East under the mandates of Mesopotamia and Palestine. ("History of Oil", Daniel Yergin, 1992, and "oil wars", Geoeconomy, journal of the Institute Choiseul for International Policy and Geoeconomy No. 38, Paris, 2006.)
Following the data from the same sources covenants are recorded twelve territorial occupation between powers without resorting to armed conflict and some 75 coups in Asia, Africa including the Maghreb, the Persian Gulf, Eastern Europe and Latin America. An unknown number of civil wars have been promoted by oil companies. Yergin claims that were 27 in the twentieth century, but it is difficult to separate from other wars and sometimes started by coups such as Sudan, Nigeria and Indonesia.
Another key goal in Libya is OPEC. The powers need to control the world oil market and safeguarding long-term reserves. The problem is that in the middle are the states and some of them are independent systems, including anti-imperialist. OPEC lost Iraq-Kuwait, then to Libya since before now want their Iran or Venezuela, and thus gradually to liquidate the union.
there anything else that has to disturbed sleep. The "7 Sisters" oil companies current are based in seven nation-states of which only two, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia, respond directly to the U.S. and NATO. The other five belong to independent States, China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Brazil.
be exhausted in the way of mediation, reasoning and agreement ran out on his own power. African Unity has no moral basis for action, because it consists of repressive regimes and the Arab League played on the opposing side. Libya was left alone with a despot in Tripoli and Benghazi pro-US opposition.
Since then only feel the stench of a war fraught with oil. Rightly said Putin's call for coalition War "reminds a medieval crusade called"
The head of Russian government criticized the operation of the international alliance in Libya, which he called "crusade." disquieting lightness that can be taken at international level currently combat actions against sovereign states, "Putin said.
reminds me of a medieval call to the crusade, which encouraged everyone to march to a release area," Putin was quoted by the Interfax news agency.
Russia abstained in the vote in the Security Council of the UN to impose an air exclusion area in Libya and did not use its veto power. "The resolution of the Security Council is complete and it is harmful, "he said in a speech to workers in the city of Wotkinsk." Clearly it allows everything to everyone, including any action against a sovereign state. "
According to Putin, Libya is a country with criteria democratic, but despite this the West has no right to intervene in an internal conflict in favor of one party. The Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, also condemned the action against Libya. On a visit in the Egyptian capital Cairo demanded security for Russian citizens found in Libya.
XXI Century becomes infatuated with the Arab world. For the third time bombs plowed land west of an Arab regime under the pretext of restoring the country's freedom. Afghanistan was, in 2001, the first to taste the liberating impulses of the Bush administration. The former president set up a coalition, there were and remain London and Paris in order to overthrow the fundamentalist Taliban regime, the famous student of theology. " The operation was the response from Washington to support the Taliban had provided Osama bin Laden. But those nefarious "students" were also U.S. allies and the West, obedient local agents then turned against the empires of the West. Bush wanted to remove them from power and establish Western democratic scheme. Afghanistan is still occupied and in a state of war. In 2003, the second import experience of democracy with bombs was Saddam Hussein. Here, the excuse was to say that Saddam Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction. Saddam was not any. It was a powerful, frightening, bloody dictator worthy backed by virtually all the democracies of the developed world. In the struggle against Iran, Saddam was an essential part of the West. He sold guns, I bought their oil, they built palaces and buildings while the tyrant oppressing his people far beyond the limits of barbarism. Massacred Shiites and Kurds, tortured and bled their country to the nausea. Georges Bush evacuated to an invasion. In the name of democracy and weapons of mass destruction an international coalition, which was not France, planted bombs and death on Iraqi soil. The country is still occupied and in war. Libya is a case apart, but the arguments are the same: the military crusade is on behalf of civilians who ruthlessly killing Muammar Qaddafi since the country was lifted in mid-February. West Khadafi found an ideal partner to explode their bombs where the shocks of history had excluded. The Libyan revolution stems from the biological revolution Tunisia broke out and spread throughout the southern Mediterranean and Gulf countries. It was, for once, a genuine movement, authentic, historical demonstration, collective and exciting all the nonsense and lies by the way the Arab world were nothing more than the crude propaganda of the West, a liar and racist construction to exclude Arabs have a legitimate place in modernity and draw with it, the convenient advantage: under the pretext of the terrorist threat of Islamic fundamentalism or remained in power bloody and corrupt dinosaurs with which the great powers were multiple businesses. Arab revolutions in Egypt to Tunisia to Yemen, Bahrain, Libya and Jordan, he showed the world that being Arab or Muslim does not mean being a terrorist, that the Koran was not a bomb and the distinctive beard and a suicide bomber behind the carved image and shaped by intelligence and Western interests there was a civil society. The emergence of western aircraft in the sky Libyan comes to tarnish that dynamic. Again, the messianic enterprise of the great powers are put to work to save the civilians of a tyrant with which those same powers fruitful relationships of proximity. No Democrat can deplore to a tyranny, but the way they live Khadafi perhaps his last moments at the head of a country shattered by 41 years of dictatorship, the two phases of Italian colonialism before and during Benito Mussolini, the British administration and the feeble monarchy of King Idris, Libya reintroduced by the British. The operation mounted to oust him smells of precipitation, cross-political interests, to adventure armed accents legitimacy is unsafe and leaves a feeling of confidence that the good end which it proposes, to free a people from dictatorship and repression, fails to clear. No doubt there were other ways to help the Libyan opposition to fighting off Khadafi. With less at stake among the actors central and peripheral influences on this crisis would not have been necessary to resort again to the Western military surgery. There were many roads, but the West retraced his steps to meet the usual formula: the release of blood and fire. The powers are put weapons in a game that belonged to them and that they contributed to complicate his mediation hasty, their inconsistency, their cowardice and their remote reflection, constantly renewed, close your eyes, make a pact with the devil, and then open when it is too late for everyone.
Eventually the war will destroy everything, the people in any way be released, and the democracy installed, democracy is no solution to the agonies suffered by the society bombarded. Afghanistan and Iraq are two examples of that and now have to add Libya. In both countries the forces imposed democracies, and none of the two countries, the situation improved lake way. Afghanistan and Iraq are being bombed, their puppet governments do not solve any problem and the wealth of both countries are being plundered by the big powers, through their corporations, but the country in question has some left. But the world applauds the interventions on behalf of God, democracy and freedom.
Libya attacking countries hide behind a resolution Security Council of the UN, one of the least democratic and representative bodies on the planet. However, what the Council provides is holy word, they are the ones that establish what is and what is not good or bad in the world. Think a little, there are 5 countries with veto power, and decide what to do and not do, without asking anything to the other 187 countries that make up the UN, and yet the whole world to accept its decisions without questioning anything . The decisions of the UN Security translates into blocks that create hunger, mafias and corruption, bombs and bullets, hit states in several atrocities. I often wonder who is really the monster in this story and who does not is.
Who will the Coalition of Cerberus in Libya to care for the gateways to the EU in Africa? Who will be the Libyan leader to keep colonizing oil contracts in Libya? Who will be the new power from Tripoli Libyan give away all the interests that the country and abroad Khadafi? What unifies Libyan leader ideological, ethnic and religious to Libya does not disintegrate into civil wars and countries want to bomb today? Who will be the new global enemy once Khadafi be exterminated? When we realize that the 5 countries with veto power in the Council UN Security are the real dictators of this country?
The world economic crisis, countries fit, trim, leaving people on the street, retired without pensions, people without medical care, but at the first opportunity, start a war. How much does each flight of a fighter jet?
Operation Odyssey of Dawn "against the forces of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya shows that the fiscal problems of the developed countries do not affect the launch of military missions.
While social spending cuts and frozen wages and state pensions unavoidable citing financial difficulties, the military operations are carried out with a simple calculation of costs.
debtor in the most global, United States, it is estimated that the cost of missiles a day amounts to about $ 100 million: a prolonged operation would cost several billion.
In the UK, living under the shadow of some of the tax cuts more drastic of the European Union, EU, it is estimated that each missile costs about $ 700,000, while an output of Tornado fighter jets is around $ 40,000.
Even in Greece, which had to be rescued by the EU and the International Monetary Fund, IMF, last year, a television channel this week put the outcry when calculating yet the marginal Greek involvement in the conflict would cost one million euros per day.
"is nonsense. There is a kind of taboo when talking about the cost of conflict. The priorities of the political class in many countries is deplorable," he told BBC Chris Nineheam spokesman for the Stop the War Coalition in London.
What should be clear, that is understood, is that the missiles of the United States, France, the United Kingdom and Spain, in principle, can accidentally fall into a school, hospital or living in Libya, but never fall into an oil well. So play
friends when they are friends, and play Imperial power on earth to ensure your domain and benefits for a thousand years.
