On both sides of the political river there Puritans, on the right who hate sex, lifestyle freedom, free love - that is, pleasure. On the left, who hate the joy This gourmet and alcohol - that is, pleasure.
And what we live day Puritanism. Throughout the debate on Carmen Aristegui, MVS and the alleged alcoholism Felipe Calderon has been a victim on whom no one has noticed. I do not mean the right of free expression or press. I do not mean the right not to be defamed (which also exists). I mean the right to be a drunk.
says the famous blanket Noronha Calderon should not be governed by a drunk, but apparently thinks that being a joint and functionally illiterate is not limiting to be a deputy. I do not know if he is those things - no I know - but there is a strong rumor saying that social networking is. It will be up to him to clarify the rumor and prove his innocence, according to what we now call "the method Aristegui. Many people quite well informed and has described his reasons to ensure or at least assume that Calderon is not drunk." Journalists who still, who know, who work near the president said that the rumor is false. It is for this reason that this rumor, we all had ever heard, had never made news.
At the same time, promoters rumor - Noronha, Arreola, et al - have not submitted any argument to support his conviction, is there any witnesses to Calderón stumbled him drunk in public (or private) of him doing a show to Yeltsin? not been shown or something strong or rather weak. Nothing.
What we have done is a disgusting smear a perfectly noble act: drink. I will forgive, but a lot of people make their best decisions drunk. In fact, thousands of humans have a sexual life only thanks alcohol. For many others, to drink is the best way to combat stress, boredom, loneliness, allergy to cats and sorrow. Dozens of studies show the benefits of taking a few drinks every day.
editorial comment I've seen all the nuances of this issue, but nobody has come out in defense of the drunks. What has happened? Where is our spirit of enjoyment of life? Have we all become Puritans since we stopped smoking? Damn, can anyone sympathize with me?
valid questions, especially after the press conference Aristegui. In it, the famous conductor said that all questions are legitimate and can be made. I think that is absolutely right: the questions are worth forever. And not only that, it is essential to make them in many cases. Moreover, it is no secret that press freedom is not an acquired right: we must fight for it every day, on all fronts. We must defend it from governments, criminals and especially economic interests or powers that be. Furthermore, I say once: MVS was wrong from start to finish throwing to Carmen. It was a silly and stupid decision. I hope to return soon to air.
But the issue is not whether they can or not ask questions. The issue is: Is minimally intelligent question? Are you targeting the right person? Because they will pardon me, yes there are stupid questions. And there in spades.
For example, from what Aristegui said in his press conference, I come to me certain: What happened in those meetings at the Distillery and Meridian that defined his departure? Who attended? "She was there? If not, how do they know? How does someone said "the head of Aristegui or 2.5 GHz band? How do you know it is a "presidential temper tantrum?
silly question, perhaps. Questions also do not think Aristegui answer. After the defense to question, it was not accepting any.
sorry, that yes, not seeing a drop of humility and self-criticism in the e-Aristegui.'s okay to not feel sorry if they did anything wrong, but the truth is that there is the possibility that your question - valid legal - has been somewhat unfair. At least, when one believes in the presumption of innocence.
Presidency and replied to Carmen. Are you satisfied with the answer? do not know. But I know I owe an apology to someone: a well-intentioned drunks who populate the world.
frankly.
0 comments:
Post a Comment